Помогите пожалуйста с английским
Identify the tense and voice forms of the verbs in passage 5.
(5)The other feature which contributes to the esteem in which the modern jury is held is that it is drawn at random from a representative cross-section of society. This is not a historical survival, but a very recent adaptation of the system to satisfy democratic ideals. Since 1972, when the property qualification was abolished, the jury has become, truly, the people’s course.
Find the verbals used in the sentences and identify their form.
1. The jurors give their verdict on the facts, after having been isolated in a separate room for deliberations.
2. The verdict is to be pronounced following the deliberations.
3. In its verdict, the jury has the duty of blending law and facts.
4. Having deliberated for more than 2 hours, the jury pronounces the verdict.
5. Most categories of British residents are obliged to undertake jury service when summoned.
Translate the sentences, which contain constructions with verbals; identify the type of the construction.
1. The verdict may be “guilty” or “not guilty”, the latter resulting from deliberation.
2. There is a notion that the jury panel is more likely to acquit.
3. Since the offence is a grave one, the offender is expected to be tried by jury.
4. Recent studies consider the jury trials to be an important safeguard against corruption.
5. The jury’s representing various layers of society contributes to the esteem in which modern jury is held.
6. It is for the jury to try most serious crimes.
Open the brackets, use the proper form of the verb in if-clauses.
1. If Henry II … (not to introduce) the procedure of collegial dispute resolutions, the British wouldn’t have had a jury system.
2. If the jurors … (not to select) at random for the coming trial, everyone would know their names in advance and could influence their decision.
3. If it … (to be) a trial by jury, the case will be tried before Crown Court.”
Translate the sentences paying attention to emphatic language means.
1. It is the jury that pronounces the verdict of “guilty” or “not guilty”.
2. The professor does know the history of trials by jury in Britain.
3. It is not uninteresting to know the statistics of acquittals by jury trials in modern Britain.
4. Were I you, I would never argue with the Judge!
Identify the tense and voice forms of the verbs in passage 5.
(5)The other feature which contributes to the esteem in which the modern jury is held is that it is drawn at random from a representative cross-section of society. This is not a historical survival, but a very recent adaptation of the system to satisfy democratic ideals. Since 1972, when the property qualification was abolished, the jury has become, truly, the people’s course.
Find the verbals used in the sentences and identify their form.
1. The jurors give their verdict on the facts, after having been isolated in a separate room for deliberations.
2. The verdict is to be pronounced following the deliberations.
3. In its verdict, the jury has the duty of blending law and facts.
4. Having deliberated for more than 2 hours, the jury pronounces the verdict.
5. Most categories of British residents are obliged to undertake jury service when summoned.
Translate the sentences, which contain constructions with verbals; identify the type of the construction.
1. The verdict may be “guilty” or “not guilty”, the latter resulting from deliberation.
2. There is a notion that the jury panel is more likely to acquit.
3. Since the offence is a grave one, the offender is expected to be tried by jury.
4. Recent studies consider the jury trials to be an important safeguard against corruption.
5. The jury’s representing various layers of society contributes to the esteem in which modern jury is held.
6. It is for the jury to try most serious crimes.
Open the brackets, use the proper form of the verb in if-clauses.
1. If Henry II … (not to introduce) the procedure of collegial dispute resolutions, the British wouldn’t have had a jury system.
2. If the jurors … (not to select) at random for the coming trial, everyone would know their names in advance and could influence their decision.
3. If it … (to be) a trial by jury, the case will be tried before Crown Court.”
Translate the sentences paying attention to emphatic language means.
1. It is the jury that pronounces the verdict of “guilty” or “not guilty”.
2. The professor does know the history of trials by jury in Britain.
3. It is not uninteresting to know the statistics of acquittals by jury trials in modern Britain.
4. Were I you, I would never argue with the Judge!
Answers & Comments
Ответ:
Let's start by identifying the tense and voice forms of the verbs in passage 5:
(5) The other feature which contributes to the esteem in which the modern jury is held is that it is drawn at random from a representative cross-section of society. This is not a historical survival, but a very recent adaptation of the system to satisfy democratic ideals. Since 1972, when the property qualification was abolished, the jury has become, truly, the people's course.
Tense and Voice Forms:
"contributes" - present simple, active voice
"is" - present simple, passive voice
"is drawn" - present simple, passive voice
"is" - present simple, passive voice
"is" - present simple, passive voice
"was abolished" - past simple, passive voice
"has become" - present perfect, passive voice
Now, let's identify the verbals in the sentences and identify their form:
"having been isolated" - past participle (used in a present participle construction)
"to be pronounced" - infinitive
"having" - present participle
"having deliberated" - present participle
"to undertake" - infinitive
Next, let's translate the sentences containing constructions with verbals and identify the type of the construction:
The verdict may be “guilty” or “not guilty”, the latter resulting from deliberation. (Participle construction)
Translation: Вердикт може бути "винним" або "не винним", останнє виникає від обговорення.
There is a notion that the jury panel is more likely to acquit. (Infinitive construction)
Translation: Є думка, що журі більше схильне виправдовувати.
Since the offence is a grave one, the offender is expected to be tried by jury. (Infinitive construction)
Translation: Оскільки злочин серйозний, очікується, що обвинувачений буде судитися журі.
Recent studies consider the jury trials to be an important safeguard against corruption. (Infinitive construction)
Translation: Останні дослідження вважають суди журі важливим захистом від корупції.
The jury's representing various layers of society contributes to the esteem in which the modern jury is held. (Participle construction)
Translation: Представництво журі різних соціальних верств сприяє повазі, якою користується сучасне журі.
It is for the jury to try most serious crimes. (Infinitive construction)
Translation: Завданням журі є розгляд найсерйозніших злочинів.
Finally, let's open the brackets and use the proper form of the verb in if-clauses:
If Henry II had not introduced the procedure of collegial dispute resolutions, the British wouldn't have had a jury system.
If the jurors were not selected at random for the coming trial, everyone would know their names in advance and could influence their decision.
If it is a trial by jury, the case will be tried before Crown Court.
Now, let's translate the sentences while paying attention to emphatic language means:
It is the jury that pronounces the verdict of "guilty" or "not guilty."
Translation: Саме журі виносить вердикт "винний" або "не винний."
The professor does know the history of trials by jury in Britain.
Translation: Професор дійсно знає історію судів журі в Британії.
It is not uninteresting to know the statistics of acquittals by jury trials in modern Britain.
Translation: Цікаво знати статистику виправдань за судами журі в сучасній Британії.
Were I you, I would never argue with the Judge!
Translation: Бувши на твоєму місці, я б ніколи не суперечив судді!
Объяснение: