Помогите перевести на адекватный русский))
The increase in criminal indictments of corporations has been matched by an increase in criminal indictments of corporate officials as well. Corporate officers will definitely be held liable for criminal acts they participate in or authorize.
In addition, they will be held liable for acts which they aid and abet through any significant assistance or encouragement. Some courts find sufficient encouragement in mere of a superior (which might signal tacit approval to a subordinate) and even in failure to stop criminal activity the official knows about. In rare instances corporate officers have been held criminally liable on a strict liability basis because they failed to control the criminal acts of subordinates (even where they had been assured that the criminal acts had been stopped), indicative of the recent trend toward increased liability is People v. O'Neil, in which a jury convicted three corporate officials of murder in the deaths of employees exposed to cyanide gas in the work place.
Please enter comments
Please enter your name.
Please enter the correct email address.
You must agree before submitting.

Answers & Comments


Copyright © 2024 SCHOLAR.TIPS - All rights reserved.